No need fro works cited. Answer the following short response questions clearly and concisely. Short phrase responses will be sufficient for some questions whereas some questions require more elaboration and explanation. Define the S.T.A.R. criteria.From Chapter One (PowerPoint from first week of class), argument is both a “process” and a “product.” Explain what this means.From Chapter One (PowerPoint), explain the theory that argument combines truth seeking and persuasion.According to Toulmin’s schema, arguments use two forms of support. List the two forms of support and briefly explain each.Explain thinking dialectically.Explain Kairos and how it connects to the Rhetorical Triangle.Explain the logical structure of an argument.Define empathic listening and give ONE example.Explain explication. Explain argumentation.In creating a plan for gathering evidence, list the three (3) suggested strategies.Explain how audience based reasons enhance Logos, Pathos, and Ethos.List the four (4) strategies for framing statistical evidence (“ethical” data manipulation).Explain issue question and give ONE example.List four (4) strategies for framing evidence (just four will suffice).Explain the four (4) suggested ways to create an effective Ethos.Explain both reading as a “believer” and reading as a “doubter.” Provide ONE scenario for each.Explain both “does” and “says” statements.Briefly explain both “self-announcing structure” and “unfolding structure” (i.e. explicit and implicit structure).Briefly explain both the “fanatical believer” and the “fanatical skeptic.” Give ONE example for each.Explain enthymeme and its importance in essays.Describe Toulmin’s system (list and define, in order, Toulmin’s logical structure).Select and list three (3) kinds of evidence that can be used in an argument (just three will suffice).Define Ethos, Logos, and Pathos.Define both a “genuine argument” and a “pseudo argument.” Give ONE brief example for each.Explain a writer’s “angle of vision.” Provide an example.