Write an argumentative essay and describe why this idea is a failure. Write in connection to gun control and school shooting topics.Add a thesis statement to the introduction.Structure:- Introduction- Subheading 1- Subheading 2- Conclusion- ReferencesNo title page is required.Don’t use text formatting (bold, italics, color), only in case when it is required by APA formatting.
Choose one of the following cases, then analyze the cases in the Questions and Problems.
Case A: Chapter 17 (6 and 7) in Dynamic Business Law
Case B: Chapter 17 (8 and 9) in Dynamic Business Law
For each assigned case, write an analysis of the issue based on the following criteria:
Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).
Identify the facts associated with the case and fact patterns.
Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties). Provide a judgment on who should win the case – be clear.
Support your decision with an appropriate rule of law.
Be prepared to defend your decision and to objectively evaluate the other points of view.
All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism). The Assignment must be submitted in (WORD format only). Use 2 to 4 References and write it in the last page by APA style. I want new words, No plagiarism “Please make it 0% percentage (we want put it the solution with the Cove page🙏
Hi
I need your help to answer the question in 3 paragraphs.
Q: (In the Rowley decision, the Supreme Court developed a twofold inquiry when determining if a student with disabilities is provided an appropriate education. Explain the Rowley case and both parts of this test. How can schools ensure that they meet each part?
I attached a file about that case. Note: I hope the answer is comprehensive to all the paragraphs of the question and does not include plagiarism.
Thank you
All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism). The Assignment must be submitted in (WORD format only). Use 2 to 4 References and write it in the last page by APA style. I want new words, No plagiarism “Please make it 0% percentage (we want put it the solution with the Cove page🙏
All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism). The Assignment must be submitted in (WORD format only). Use 2 to 4 References and write it in the last page by APA style. I want new words, No plagiarism “Please make it 0% percentage (we want put it the solution with the Cove page🙏
From your analysis of the readings identify the pros and cons of ILP and your evaluation of whether state and local law enforcement should adopt such a program. Also, based on your analysis of the readings, what is your assessment of the current capability to share information and connect the dots and are there additional efforts that need to be undertaken?
See Below for attached readings to help assist in answer:
The office of the Director of Intelligence for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines intelligence as “. . . information that has been analyzed and refined so that it is useful to policymakers in making decisions—specifically, decisions about potential threats to our national security” (FBI, n.d.).
The military defines intelligence a bit differently saying that intelligence is “The product resulting from the collection, processing, integration, evaluation, analysis, and interpretation of available information concerning foreign nations, hostile or potentially hostile forces or elements, or areas of actual or potential operations. The term is also applied to the activity which results in the product and to the organizations engaged in such activity” (U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2010, p. 158).
Within the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), there is a similar discussion on the definition of intelligence. Michael Warner (2002), a CIA historian, wrote an article that discussed the defining of intelligence in which he gives an overview of the history of how the term has been defined both in legislation and in the private literature. Reviewing all the literature, Warner defined the term stating, “Intelligence is secret, state activity to understand or influence foreign entities” (Walker, 2002, p. 4). Here we begin to see the issue of intelligence being an understanding of information and that intelligence is intended to influence foreign entities. The focus is on the use of intelligence for security, but even more so to focus on threats of acts of violence against the U.S. and its interests. In reality, intelligence is used for much more. It is used to support all the instruments of national power; diplomatic, informational, military and economic.
The FBI is the primary agency responsible for counterintelligence on American soil, prevention of a foreign government’s and/or terrorist group’s illicit acquisition of our secrets. The Bureau notes that counterintelligence is its second highest priority, and its importance is derived from protecting the American public from attacks. Operationally, what we want to do with counterintelligence is to prevent terrorists and sympathetic governments to terrorists from obtaining information about our counterterrorism activities and potential targets.
While a lot of time and effort goes into gathering and analyzing information to better ensure against attacks against the nation and its people, there is also a tremendous amount of time and effort to develop intelligence that allows us to better negotiate treaties, to recognize potential hot-spots around the world, and to understand how we can bring those elements of our national power to bear on events around the world in such a way as to gain the most advantage for the nation. This breadth of utility for intelligence is seen in the four strategic goals set forth in the National Intelligence Strategy:
“1) Execute our mission smartly and identify ways to better leverage the substantive work of our partners and potential partners; (2) Continue to integrate, transform, and strengthen the IC’s support to national security; (3) Protect privacy and civil liberties and adhere to the Principles of Professional Ethics for the IC; and (4) Adapt to changing needs and resources and innovate to provide unique anticipatory and strategic intelligence” (Director of National Intelligence, 2014, p. forward). Intelligence won’t be shared when it is considered to be CLASSIFIED information. And the most common way that classified information is protected is to consider it “in the name of national security.” Even though this is extremely frustrating, it does have some legitimate applications such as protecting sources, methods, and hard-won knowledge and to deny our adversary certain information, since public disclosure or compromise of intelligence can cause adversaries to practice deception or change their means of communications or operations. Further, this information is distributed and maintained in multiple locations. While this creates security in avoiding single points of failure, it also creates an issue of how analysts can become aware of information and assess their need to know. As a side note, decentralization is required by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Revision Act.
If you look at the Department of Homeland Security, you have the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, which coordinates the intelligence received from the DHS agencies. Those agencies need to work with state and local governments as well as other federal agencies. In the past, intelligence information was shared with other agencies on a “need to know” basis. What happened was that federal agencies were unwilling to work with the state and local agencies. This was unacceptable, so this mode of thinking was changed. Now, what are called fusion centers have been developed where local, state, and federal agencies in a geographical area receive and analyze localized intelligence. This concept makes sense as state and local agencies are on the front lines, so they potentially have numerous opportunities to gather information of local and sometimes national importance regarding terrorist threats.
In 2012, the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs issued a report on state and local fusion centers. Basically, the report found that the fusion centers had provided little, if any, value in the nation’s counterterrorism efforts. The report did not seek to assess if the fusion centers were providing value in fields other than terrorism, such as public safety, criminal investigations, or disaster management. From their assessment, the Subcommittee recommended nine actions that should be taken to improve the value of fusion center support of homeland security counterterrorism efforts. Many of the recommendation have to do with funding and accounting for the use of the funds against measures to ensure the taxpayer is getting value for their investment. Additionally, the report made some recommendations regarding personnel and operations. These recommendations include: (1) reforming intelligence reporting efforts at state and local fusion centers, (2) improve the training of intelligence reporters and (3) DHS should align its practices and guidelines to protect civil liberties, so they adhere to the Constitution, federal law, and its statutory mission (U.S. Congress, Senate, 2012, pp. 106-107). Therefore, there may be some debate on the value and utility of fusion centers and a number of your readings explore this issue. State and local entities are on the front lines of the counterterrorism efforts. One of the primary reasons insurgencies and terrorist groups fail is the local police force. It is not, as most people think, military action. In one respect, this has to do with intelligence – the local police are the ones who know who belongs in the community and who does not, and the ones to whom the local residents report the intelligence that ultimately brings the downfall of the insurgency or the terrorist group. This also extends to preventing a terrorist attack.
It is the local police, more than anybody else who get out in the local community and knows what’s going on in that local community. The two key ingredients in community policing are problem-solving and community partnerships. Thus, the police, to a large extent, must depend on the public to supply terrorist-related information to effectively thwart local terrorist plots. Every terrorist has to live someplace and that someplace is always some neighborhood that is local to those residents. What the bad guys try to do is blend in with the population so it becomes imperative for the citizens to become aware of suspicious persons and activity before the police do, and report it to the police.
The nation’s first line of defense against terrorism and other illegal activities is that we have is that there are approximately 600,000,000 eyes and ears of the citizens in this country. That line of defense is already in place. It cost nothing to put it in place. It costs nothing to maintain it. It only needs to be trained to look for, and report, suspicious persons and behavior to the proper authorities in the local area. Police officers across the country are now working more closely with citizens and communities because they have become aware of exactly how important and how inexpensive this first line of defense is. This is called “intelligence-led policing” and this week’s readings have articles on this concept, both positive and negative.
One of the big problems in attaining this cooperation from local residents is if the police are of a different culture. This can breed distrust, and distrust can breed a lack of cooperation. To overcome this problem, most police departments will appoint a police liaison officer to help reduce the distrust. That liaison officer actually becomes the advocate for the community area and, as an advocate, the police officer can work closely with community groups, generate support, and identify problems that otherwise may not have been identified. In addition, this liaison officer can actually help in recruiting individuals of a particular culture for the police department and other governmental positions.
If you compare a local police department with some federal agency, such as the FBI, you’ll find that the federal agencies perform what is called top-down investigations, while the local police departments conduct bottom-up investigations. Regardless of who collects the intelligence, you should consider intelligence as actually being a process composed of four steps: collect the information; collate and analyze it; disseminate it; and use it. This may sound simplistic but it provides a perfect blueprint for not only any specific entity, but also how that entity should interact with each other.
Must be a minimum of 275 words. Minimal direct quotes. Please use APA citation and include websites attached.
PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF THERES ANY CONFUSION OR QUESTIONS SO WE CAN WORK THROUGH THIS FOR AN ACCURATE ANSWER!
done
Seen
Oct 19th, 2022
Select a scholarly journal article (no older than 2015) relevant to the course regarding Homeland Security or Homeland Defense. You will conduct an article review of that scholarly journal article. It must be related to the course or course materials but should not be one of the provided course readings. The intent is for students to do some external research away from the provided references and find an article in the AMU/APUS Library. Students should search the library’s online databases, such as ProQuest, EbscoHost, and others, to find scholarly or peer-reviewed articles. Web address, blogs, news sites are not scholarly.
Additionally, the review of the journal article is an evaluation of the article’s strengths, weaknesses, and validity. It is used to inform of the article’s value through your explanation, interpretation, and analysis. As you do this, ask the major questions that are central to the review process:
What is the purpose of this article?
Why is it important to investigate or examine the subject of the article?
How are the authors carrying out the task? Are their methods and comments appropriate and adequate to the task?
What do they claim to have found out? Are the findings clearly stated?
How does this advance knowledge in the field?
Hint: These would make really good section titles for your paper.
Your work should consist of:
Introduction (this will have a well-defined purpose statement in your intro paragraph that provides guidance to the reader about what you are going to cover in your paper)
Body (feel free to use sub-section headings as needed)
Conclusion (this wraps up the key points of your work and brings your paper to a logical conclusion)
Technical Requirements
Your paper must be at a minimum of 5 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit).
A peer reviewed journal article should be used.
Other references may be used, but only to support the review of the primary journal article.
Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space.
Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.
Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.
done
Seen
Oct 19th, 2022
Instructions
– The Answer must be from the textbook
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qlYjuE7S7j_FMWMTLBC5voETJ5ckQ0Df/view?usp=drivesdk
– No plagiarism
– Please use the required textbook for the information in your answers and cite accordingly
– APA Style for the Reference
Action Items
Submission Instructions
• Choose one of the following cases, then analyze the cases in the Questions and Problems.
Case A: Chapter 15 (questions 8 and 9) and Chapter 16 (question 7) in Dynamic Business Law.
Case B: Chapter 15 (questions 6 and 7) and Chapter 16 (question 9) in Dynamic Business Law.
For each assigned case, write an analysis of the issue based on the following criteria:
Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).
Identify the facts associated with the case and fact patterns.
Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties). Provide a judgment on who should win the case – be clear.
Support your decision with an appropriate rule of law.
Be prepared to defend your decision and to objectively evaluate the other points of view.
1) Please write the solution according to what is required and avoid copying from other students and avoid literary theft
2) Writing references in APA format