Write at least 400 words on Chap 11
A critical recap does not mean summarizing the entire chapter. Here are some questions to ask yourself while reading and completing your post:
What did I learn that I did not previously know?
What did I find most interesting?
How does the content I read/watched relate to previous courses, readings, personal experiences, current events, etc.?
Do I have any critiques and/or questions?
Remember, you are not required to answer these questions, but they may guide you in drafting your critical recap.
Tag: Law
Defendant: Alex Ashworth/FIRAC FORMAT COLORADO
Facts:
Alex was in his friend Allison’s home in Boulder, Colorado drinking straight vodka and doing drugs. Alex told Allison that he has not taken his prescribed mental health medications for two weeks. This did not concern Allison until Alex started discussing his plan to kill his father. Allison knew that without his prescribed medication, Alex could be psychotic. When Allison said she would call the police, Alex pulled a handgun out of his bag and threatened her with it. Allison, who feared for her life, fled from her home with the intention of going to a neighbor’s house to call the police. As soon as Allison left, Alex stuffed a rag in the half-empty vodka bottle, lit it, and tossed it on the couch as he left the dwelling. Allison’s dwelling went up in flames.
Alex then proceeded to the nearest convenience store, where, brandishing the weapon, he took money and cigarettes. Alex then drove to the home of his father, where he broke down the door by kicking it in and shot his father to death.
The local police arrived shortly after that to find Alex unconscious on the living room floor. When the police revived Alex, Alex said he had no memory of the last several hours. Local police took Alex to their headquarters in handcuffs, where they interrogated him. After 10 hours of interrogation, Alex confessed to killing his father. Local police, however, forgot to read Alex his Miranda rights.
Note that the Unit 6 Assignment requires a discussion of the two strongest defenses to the crimes Alex committed (as you mapped out in your Unit 6 Assignment). The crimes could be based on Colorado statutory law or if you choose to bring up the defense of the failure of police to read Miranda Warnings prior to interrogating Alex, this would be based on constitutional law (see the sources noted above). Be sure to point to the relevant Colorado statute or constitutional law for each defense you identify that would apply to one or more of the crimes in this scenario and describe how defense counsel would go about trying to prove this defense. The best approach is to quote the relevant portion of the statute setting forth the defense (remember to use ellipses (the three dots …) to omit words that are not relevant in the statute) and always place quotation marks around any wording directly from the statue or other source.) Your paper should be at least 2 pages, double-spaced and should include the required in-text citations and references:
Colorado statutes are cited in this format:
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-803
Here are the criminal statutes setting forth potential relevant defenses for Alex under Colorado law: https://casetext.com/statute/colorado-revised-statutes/title-18-criminal-code/article-1-provisions-applicable-to-offenses-generally/part-8-responsibility (Alex’s best chances for mitigation are under 18-1-803 (Impaired mental condition) and 18-1-804 (Intoxication)).
Here’s the Cornell Law site, An Introduction to Basic Legal Citation at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/citation/ – it has awesome explanations of how to cite all types of legal sources and has plenty of examples to illustrate.
Discussion Thread Understanding Defensive Counterintelligence
I DONT HAVE THE TEXTBOOK SO PLEASE READ BEFORE YOU BID!!!!!!!
Based on your readings thus far from the text and your own research explain the steps in developing a counterintelligence plan. Explain how the “Logical Model for Threat” is created and used. Describe one measure, act, or initiative from each of these defensive counterintelligence domains: physical security, personnel security, information security, and communication security. Choose one from each domain that you think offers the best results.
Law of E-Commerce
Identify one issue from the weekly reading and create a Legal Issue Brief.
Your brief should be no more than one page and follow the format below.
Title (Issue in 2-5 words)
Student Name
Issue (1-3 sentences)
Facts (3-4 sentences)
Student position (2-4 sentences)
Rationale (5-7 sentences)
Law 9455
Action steps Choose one of the following cases, and then analyze the cases into questions and problems. Case A: My order:
1- No theft, no match please.
2-You can find the instructions inside the document
3- Please write a paper in the document
4- Write a report on whatever you use to research and what you write in a different document because we will discuss it separately in class
Write at least2 references using the APA style.
NB:
Please use simple language
Put the in-text quote in each.
Additions within the document.
Chapter 35 (6 and 7), Chapter 36 (9 and 10) in Dynamic Labor Law Case B: Chapter 35 (4 and 5), Chapter 36 (7 and 8) in Dynamic Labor Law For each case assigned, write Analysis of the case on the basis of the following criteria: Identification of the parties involved in the dispute of the case (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant). Identify the facts associated with the case and the patterns of facts. Develop the appropriate legal case(s) involved (ie, the specific legal issue between the parties). Make a judgment about who should win the case – be clear. Support your decision with the appropriate rule of law. Be prepared to defend your decision and to evaluate other points of view objectively
Law 101 – 3077
Action Items
Choose one of the following cases, then analyze the cases in the Questions and Problems.
Case A: Chapter 35 (6 and 7), Chapter 36 (9 and 10) in Dynamic Business Law
Case B: Chapter 35 (4 and 5), Chapter 36 (7 and 8) in Dynamic Business Law
For each assigned case, write an analysis of the issue based on the following criteria:
Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).
Identify the facts associated with the case and fact patterns.
Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties). Provide a judgment on who should win the case – be clear.
Support your decision with an appropriate rule of law.
Be prepared to defend your decision and to objectively evaluate the other points of view.
discuions law 6807
My order:
1- No plagiarism, no match
please.
2-You can find the
instructions inside the doc
3- Please write a paper in
the document
4- Write a report on
whatever you use to research and what you write in a different document because
we will discuss it separately in class
Write at least 5-
references using the APA style.
Noticeable:
Please use simple language
Put the in-text quote in
each.
Additions within the
document
Case B: Chapter 35 (4 and 5), Chapter 36 (7 and 8) in Dynamic Business Law
For each assigned case, write an analysis of the issue based on the following criteria:
Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).
Identify the facts associated with the case and fact patterns.
Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties). Provide a judgment on who should win the case – be clear.
Support your decision with an appropriate rule of law.
Be prepared to defend your decision and to objectively evaluate the other points of view.
law cases
Choose one of the following cases, then analyze the cases in the Questions and Problems.
Case A: Chapter 35 (6 and 7), Chapter 36 (9 and 10) in Dynamic Business Law
Case B: Chapter 35 (4 and 5), Chapter 36 (7 and 8) in Dynamic Business Law
For each assigned case, write an analysis of the issue based on the following criteria:
Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).
Identify the facts associated with the case and fact patterns.
Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties). Provide a judgment on who should win the case – be clear.
Support your decision with an appropriate rule of law.
Be prepared to defend your decision and to objectively evaluate the other points of view.
Law discussion govt
What is the Court’s argument in Virginia v. United States? What part of the Constitution is at issue in this case. What arguments are offered on the part of the Virginia Military Institute for banning women. In the dissent, what arguments are offered for the claim that women but be admitted to the college? What is your view of this issue? How would you have decided if you were a judge on this case?
Law discussion dtm
Choose one of the following cases, then analyze the cases in the Questions and Problems.
Case A: Chapter 35 (6 and 7), Chapter 36 (9 and 10) in Dynamic Business Law
Case B: Chapter 35 (4 and 5), Chapter 36 (7 and 8) in Dynamic Business Law
For each assigned case, write an analysis of the issue based on the following criteria:
Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).
Identify the facts associated with the case and fact patterns.
Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties). Provide a judgment on who should win the case – be clear.
Support your decision with an appropriate rule of law.
Be prepared to defend your decision and to objectively evaluate the other points of view.